Search for: "State v. Gore" Results 81 - 100 of 1,327
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2021, 9:05 pm by Richard Briffault
Gore—called attention to the shortcomings of local election administration. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 3:10 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  However, "expedition will only be justified on the basis of real, objectively viewed urgency" and "commercial certainty needs to be evaluated in its proper context" (James Petter v EMC Europe [2015] EWCA Civ 480).In the context of expedition of patent trials to avoid the German injunction gap, Mr Justice Birss (as he then was) in Nicoventures Trading Limited v Philip Morris & or [2020] EWHC 1594 added three points to… [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
(We all remember how a tight timeline affected the quality of judicial work product in complicated election matters in Bush v. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 12:41 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
When addressing whether to accede to an application for expedition, the English Court will apply the guidance given by the Court of Appeal in Geox v Gore[5][2008] EWCA (Civ) 622 which may be summarised as follows: whether the applicants have shown good reason for expedition; whether expedition would interfere with the good administration of justice; whether expedition would cause prejudice to the party; and whether there are any other special factors. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am by Phil Dixon
Judges Inman and Griffin concurred. (1) Victim’s statements regarding identity of attacker were admissible as excited utterances despite possible passage of time between attack and statements; (2) Sixth Amendment confrontation argument not raised during trial was waived on appeal notwithstanding pretrial motion; (3) No abuse of discretion or prejudicial error in admission of testimony identifying defendant on a jail phone call and interpreting the contents of the call State… [read post]