Search for: "State v. Gray" Results 1 - 20 of 1,370
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2019, 8:16 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Illegal sentence — Life without parole In 1986, a jury sitting in the Circuit Court for Howard County convicted Isaac Gray, the appellant, of first-degree rape and battery after he attacked a woman on a bicycle path in Columbia, held a knife to her throat, and raped her twice. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 6:43 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Recorded telephone conversations Henry Jefferson Gray, appellant, was convicted by a jury sitting in the Circuit Court for Queen Anne’s County of three counts of conspiracy: conspiracy to distribute cocaine, conspiracy to possess cocaine with the intent to distribute, and conspiracy to possess cocaine. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm by Reproductive Rights
The Huffington Post: Arizona State Senator Cites Abortion Rights As Factor In Tucson Shooting, Nick Wing: Linda Gray, a Republican state senator from Arizona, claimed over the weekend that abortion rights preserved by Roe v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 6:34 am by Unreported Opinions
Criminal procedure — Sentence modification — Justice Reinvestment Act On March 26, 2010, in the Circuit Court for Charles County, Delante Phillip Gray, appellant, pleaded guilty pursuant to a binding guilty plea agreement to distribution of a controlled dangerous substance (“CDS”) and admitted to violations of probation in two other cases. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 7:43 am
Gray, the state high court found a default judgment against the driver who caused the crash is not binding against a plaintiff's own insurer where the firm was not listed as a defendant in the original complaint. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 11:30 am by JA Hodnicki
Popofsky & Anthony Biagioli (Ropes & Gray) address The Sherman Act's Extra-Territorial Reach: Unresolved Questions Raised by United States v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 4:41 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In discussing the “all or sub- stantially all” requirement, we stated: As we noted in SKF, the sale by a trademark owner of the very same goods that he claims are gray market goods is inconsistent with a claim that consumers will be confused by those alleged gray market goods. [read post]