Search for: "State v. Gray" Results 21 - 40 of 1,899
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2015, 7:43 am
Gray, the state high court found a default judgment against the driver who caused the crash is not binding against a plaintiff's own insurer where the firm was not listed as a defendant in the original complaint. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 4:39 pm by Jay McDaniel
As demonstrated in a recent case from the Southern District of New York, Zip International Group, LLC v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:08 pm by INFORRM
-Gen. v Punch Ltd [2003] 1 AC 1046 at [87]-[88] in the Court of Appeal and at [95] in the House of Lords; and Jockey Club v Buffham [2003] QB 462 (Gray J). [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 11:30 am by JA Hodnicki
Popofsky & Anthony Biagioli (Ropes & Gray) address The Sherman Act's Extra-Territorial Reach: Unresolved Questions Raised by United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 11:13 am by Danielle Citron
 My colleague David Gray and I have spent lots of time thinking and writing about the fog surrounding this issue in light of United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 11:30 am by JA Hodnicki
Popofsky & Anthony Biagioli (Ropes & Gray) address The Sherman Act's Extra-Territorial Reach: Unresolved Questions Raised by United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 7:12 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Forlenza of Patterson Belknap is available.Previous IPBiz post on Ropes & Gray case: Plagiarism by patent attorney leads to malpractice claim A piece in jdjournal noted:Ropes & Gray filed a motion to dismiss on Tuesday, citing the fact it is common practice to copy text from other patents. [read post]
28 May 2010, 4:41 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In discussing the “all or sub- stantially all” requirement, we stated: As we noted in SKF, the sale by a trademark owner of the very same goods that he claims are gray market goods is inconsistent with a claim that consumers will be confused by those alleged gray market goods. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 10:21 am
Counsel for Ronald Gray, who is under a presidentially approved death sentence, filed his habeas petition yesterday in U.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 8:11 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Possession of a firearm Appellant, Kevin Smith, was charged by the State with being a prohibited person in possession of a firearm. [read post]