Search for: "State v. Gray"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,954
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
In other words, legally made works can be bought and sold and resold on the “grey” (or “gray” for those not in the Commonwealth) market, according to common sense. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 2:54 pm
In Defenders of Wildlife v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 8:15 am
Co v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:31 pm
Clark County Public Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 10:42 am
Case Name: Gray v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 4:31 pm
It seems like I've been writing and speaking on Hunter v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 3:52 am
State, 331 Md. 179 (1993) and Gray v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
Key Findings Excessive tax rates on cigarettes approach de facto prohibition in some states, inducing black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes in some states induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 1:56 am
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Gray v Crown Prosecution Service [2010] EWHC 2144 (QB) (20 August 2010) High Court (Chancery Division) British Broadcasting Corporation v Harpercollins Publishers Ltd & Anor [2010] EWHC 2424 (Ch) (04 October 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Hulme, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government [2010] EWHC 2386 (Admin) (19 August 2010) Crown Prosecution Service, R… [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
Gray goods, or parallel imports of genuine goods, refer to a fact pattern in which someone other that the designated exclusive United States importer buys genuine trademarked goods outside the United States and imports them for sale into the United States in competition with the exclusive United States importer.[4] While the terms, "gray goods" and "parallel imports," are often used interchangeably, opponents… [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 3:57 am
Not only is this hardly a solution, but to suggest this red herring in the gray area of conflicted intent is to distract attention from the root problem of immunity as reflected in the nightmarish Supreme Court decision in Connick v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 8:50 pm
Gray, 37 M.J. 730 (A.C.M.R. 1992); United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 11:35 am
In the meantime, however, the Supreme Court decided Gray v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 7:39 am
On May 21, 2012, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Astrue v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 10:51 am
On July 23, 2007, the Supreme Court of Canada announced that that it will deliver its decision on Euro-Excellence, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 1:53 am
INTRO: In 1978, the gray wolf (Canis lupus ) was listed as threatened in Minnesota and endangered throughout the rest of the conterminous United States. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 9:36 am
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+V&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=6100000&SeqEnd=8350000 Read More [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 4:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 5:34 am
The issue of service of process under the Hague Service Convention arose again recently in Gray v. [read post]
