Search for: "State v. Griffin" Results 161 - 180 of 1,163
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
A probationary employee may be discharged without a hearing and without a statement of reasons (see Matter of Griffin v MTA N.Y. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
A probationary employee may be discharged without a hearing and without a statement of reasons (see Matter of Griffin v MTA N.Y. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
This post surveys the pro/con social science evidence presented in the amicus briefs in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Gender violence happens no matter what the circumstances are, including all the harms that were increased by the pandemic.I always teach United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 4:16 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Ct. 388, 389 (2015) (Scalia, J., dissenting from denial of petition for writ of certiorari), the Supreme Court has reversed us twenty-two times for not applying the deference to state court decisions mandated by AEDPA. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 6:21 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Judge Griffin, on the other hand, concluded Taylor was simply "Batson v. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 5:48 pm by Mitchell Jagodinski
Bosse murdered his girlfriend, Katrina Griffin, who was a Native American, and her two young children. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 6:32 am by Unreported Opinions
Griffin”), that took place on Super Bowl Sunday, February 3, 2019. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Dissent: The $500 limit is not too low, and the $3k limit is no different from the prohibition on foreign contributions upheld in Bluman v. [read post]
17 Jul 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
It is no accident that a party like that finds a kindred spirit in the theory of a unitary executive.Both Griffin and Blake Emerson pick up on this theme. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am by Phil Dixon
Judges Inman and Griffin concurred. (1) Victim’s statements regarding identity of attacker were admissible as excited utterances despite possible passage of time between attack and statements; (2) Sixth Amendment confrontation argument not raised during trial was waived on appeal notwithstanding pretrial motion; (3) No abuse of discretion or prejudicial error in admission of testimony identifying defendant on a jail phone call and interpreting the contents of the call State… [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
” Professor Avins and the Commission were convinced that Brown v. [read post]