Search for: "State v. Griggs"
Results 41 - 60
of 112
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2023, 3:37 pm
” For the majority, that “principle” comes from a 1982 Supreme Court case, Griggs v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm
This principle was found in a statement in Griggs v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 6:05 am
By: Colleen V. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 3:26 am
But the issue in the case was whether the disparate impact analysis from Title VII, approved in Griggs v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 9:24 am
Justice Ginsburg writes: In arriving at its order, the Court barely acknowledges the pathmarking decision in Griggs v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:36 am
In 1971, the court ruled in Griggs v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 1:46 pm
See Griggs v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 5:43 am
Consequently, liability for disparate impact essentially means that funding recipients must be prepared to justify virtually everything they do as "necessary" (as defined by Griggs v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 2:21 pm
Accord United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2022, 10:30 am
” Similarly, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in Tooltrend, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 5:29 am
Griggs v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:19 pm
The theory of disparate impact in racial employment discrimination cases is recognized in Griggs v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 5:33 pm
" Griggs v. [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 9:57 am
That would be Ricci v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 2:16 pm
The Supreme Court's ruling in Griggs v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:16 pm
The Supreme Court's ruling in Griggs v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:01 am
McClung (379 U.S. 294, 1964) upholding the right of the federal government to mandate desegregation in restaurants; and Griggs v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 1:05 pm
In 1971, the Supreme Court interpreted Title VII broadly in Griggs v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 1:10 pm
Walden v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:20 pm
Griggs v. [read post]
