Search for: "State v. Grooms"
Results 181 - 200
of 432
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2019, 11:38 am
As we have previously reported, in April 2018, the California Supreme Court issued a sweeping ruling in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 9:45 am
In part of its opinion, the court concluded that state courts have concurrent jurisdiction with federal courts over RLUIPA claims.In Ruffin v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 2:29 pm
Creed v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 11:49 am
Ohio, Texas v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 11:49 am
Ohio, Texas v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 6:00 am
In Odneal v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 11:04 am
This beaming bride is the daughter of First Circuit Judge Kermit V. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 12:14 pm
Creed's letter of termination stated she was fired because she didn't comply with its dress and grooming code.Ms. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:51 am
Photo credit: 3D Quick Link Crossword // ShutterStock * United States v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 8:38 am
Discrimination Although many states prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation, federal courts generally hold that Title VII does not (e.g., Jantz v Emblem Health, SDNY, 2012). [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 6:32 am
A temporary restraining order issued by New York State Supreme Court Justice Eileen Rakower on November 23 prohibits ROC-NY from engaging in a variety of demonstration tactics. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:50 am
Second, and giving all appropriate weight to what was said in R (C (A Minor)) v Secretary of State for Justice [2008] EWCA Civ 882, [2009] QB 657, and E v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary and another (Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission and others intervening) [2008] UKHL 66, [2009] 1 AC 536, the circumstan [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:54 pm
In Bruno v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 10:27 pm
Mast v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 5:42 am
In Home Care Association of America, et al v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 12:58 pm
(See also Reno v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 6:06 am
In one of the leading cases on this topic, Jespersen v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 10:40 am
As state laws about marriage showed, the laws assumed those marrying would be “bride and groom” “husband and wife. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 5:30 am
See Bowen v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
” The early dress and grooming code cases, which preceded the Supreme Court’s 1989 decision in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
