Search for: "State v. Grooms" Results 281 - 300 of 403
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am by Christa Culver
§ 2000cc et seq., to require only a minimal showing that a prison grooming rule which concededly imposes a substantial burden on religious exercise is the “least restrictive means of furthering [a] compelling governmental interest. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 9:44 am by David Urban
  In general, it requires reasonable accommodation of employees’ religious grooming and practices, unless accommodation would impose an “undue hardship. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
If a state were to pass a law today saying that, say, its governor will decide which slate of electors will represent the state in the Electoral College every four years, that law would not violate the United States Constitution.Now, however, such laws have no prospect of being passed in enough states to guarantee a Republican win in 2024. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 6:14 am by Naomi Shatz
As explained above, any sex-specific dress or grooming policy, like any other sex-based classification, must be substantially related to an important governmental objective. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 7:01 am by Farah Pandith, Jacob Ware
Shamima Begum, a notorious Islamic State female fighter who traveled to join the group in Syria at age 15, has for instance made frequent claims of self-defense, asserting that she was “groomed” into joining the Islamic State in 2015. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am by INFORRM
Mr Schofield was awarded £90,000 for an article published by the defendant’s which contained various defamatory and false allegations, including that Mr Schofield was involved in grooming children and/or young people. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 11:55 am by Heather Coffman
  While the law states it is confirming existing law, rather than creating new law, employers need to ensure their practices comply with AB 5’s rules. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 1:48 am by INFORRM
Humphreys J stated that there had been “no debate around the issue of the public interest, relevant to the anonymity of suspects, nor any consideration of the need for a fair balance of rights. [read post]