Search for: "State v. Grooms" Results 381 - 400 of 402
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
Legislatures in the United States and abroad have passed increasingly restrictive and intrusive laws in order to protect the public from convicted sexual offenders. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 10:15 am
Stating the Obvious: The groom-to-be allegedly had no involvement in the floral arrangements! [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 4:28 pm
The court also rejected First Amendment and Equal Protection challenges to the grooming policy.In Talbert v. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 6:58 pm
On March 28, the Southern District of Texas granted a preliminary injunction in Pet Silk, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 9:55 am
The court found that the state had a compelling interest in requiring the test.In Thomas v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 11:40 pm
Plaintiff had claimed that he should be allowed to grow his hair for religious reasons despite prison grooming requirements.In Fisher v. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 12:19 pm
We explore the marketing of branded service and the law's response through an analysis of Jespersen v. [read post]