Search for: "State v. Grooms" Results 41 - 60 of 440
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2022, 6:14 am by Naomi Shatz
As explained above, any sex-specific dress or grooming policy, like any other sex-based classification, must be substantially related to an important governmental objective. [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
That was the knock, of course, on the infamous (and thoroughly discredited) Bush v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am by Phil Dixon
There was therefore no error in the case. (1) Defendant’s challenge to the second step of the Batson analysis was preserved; (2) The State’s proffered explanations for its use of peremptory challenges were racially neutral; (3) The trial court did not clearly err in finding that the defendant failed to show purposeful discrimination under the totality of circumstances State v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 1:01 pm by Kevin LaCroix
 One of the first university cases ended up before the United States Supreme Court in Hughes v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:08 pm by Hannah Pugh
Supreme Court has revisited protections for religious freedom through Fulton v. [read post]