Search for: "State v. Grooms"
Results 61 - 80
of 455
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2022, 2:21 pm
" See also Doe v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am
There was therefore no error in the case. (1) Defendant’s challenge to the second step of the Batson analysis was preserved; (2) The State’s proffered explanations for its use of peremptory challenges were racially neutral; (3) The trial court did not clearly err in finding that the defendant failed to show purposeful discrimination under the totality of circumstances State v. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 11:22 am
From Thursday's opinion in State v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:56 am
In Holt v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 8:54 am
–State v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 2:14 pm
From Markowski v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 1:01 pm
One of the first university cases ended up before the United States Supreme Court in Hughes v. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 5:08 am
” Louis v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 2:25 pm
From the start of Judge Nelson Román's (long) opinion, in U.S. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 3:26 am
Bozzi v. [read post]
Proposed Michigan Bill Banning Discrimination Based on Hair Texture and Race-based Hairstyles Stalls
14 Sep 2021, 8:56 pm
The case, EEOC v. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 11:52 am
Cites to Doe v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 12:30 pm
Fifth Circuit: An argument that is V for Vacuous. [read post]
7 Aug 2021, 1:42 pm
Supreme Court decision in Bostock v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 3:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:08 pm
Supreme Court has revisited protections for religious freedom through Fulton v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 10:27 pm
Mast v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
Following on the heels of the Supreme Court’s June 2020 decision in Bostock v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 9:01 pm
In the famous footnote 4 of United States v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 8:58 am
Its Compliance Manual states both that discrimination based on cultural dress and grooming practices is race discrimination, but also that grooming policies are not discriminatory so long as they do not discriminate on the basis of hair texture, and are applied neutrally to all employees, citing Rogers v. [read post]
