Search for: "State v. Grooms" Results 121 - 140 of 423
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2007, 12:22 am
Subscription Required KINGS COUNTYContracts Groom Entitled to Damages for Photographer's Unskillful Photos; Breach of Contract Claim Stated Andreani v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 10:15 am
Stating the Obvious: The groom-to-be allegedly had no involvement in the floral arrangements! [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 7:00 am by Howard Friedman
 The state's rescission of its grooming policy mooted his claims for equitable relief.In Wilkins v. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 9:55 am
The court found that the state had a compelling interest in requiring the test.In Thomas v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
The judge awarded Mr Monir £40,000 in damages and costs, and said in his judgment: “It needs to be stated clearly: Mr Monir is completely innocent. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Smith, Lauren Fontana, Susannah William Pollvogt & Tanya Washington, Brief of Amici Curiae Scholars of the Constitutional Rights of Children in Support of Petitioners in Obergefell v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 8:58 am by Naomi Shatz
Its Compliance Manual states both that discrimination based on cultural dress and grooming practices is race discrimination, but also that grooming policies are not discriminatory so long as they do not discriminate on the basis of hair texture, and are applied neutrally to all employees, citing Rogers v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 4:03 am by Russ Bensing
Swidas and State v. [read post]