Search for: "State v. Grooms" Results 141 - 160 of 423
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2010, 4:25 am by Howard Friedman
 The court held that double-celling plaintiff with a Muslim cell mate did not amount to state action in violation of 1st Amendment rights.In Johnson v. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 6:58 pm
On March 28, the Southern District of Texas granted a preliminary injunction in Pet Silk, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:29 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 142803, Nov. 1, 2011) and permitted an inmate who was a member of the Nazarite Religious (Hebrew Israelite) Faith to proceed with a free exercise challenge that the state's grooming standards that prevented him from wearing dreadlocks. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 9:07 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 26385, Feb. 16, 2010) and dismissed a claim by a Sunni Muslim prisoner that his rights under RLUIPA were violated by prison grooming polices that required him to wear short hear and be clean shaven.In Ingram v. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 12:19 pm
We explore the marketing of branded service and the law's response through an analysis of Jespersen v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 12:54 am by CMS
The appellant, Mark Sutherland, began corresponding on Grindr with a member of a PH group, Groom Resisters Scotland, posing as a thirteen year old boy (“the decoy”). [read post]