Search for: "State v. Grooms" Results 141 - 160 of 430
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2016, 6:19 am by Joy Waltemath
” His retaliation claim was also dismissed since his transfer was not adverse and he failed to administratively exhaust his constructive discharge claim (Roberts v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 6:53 am
Galang, supra.The Court of Appeals begins the opinion, as courts usually do, by explaining how, and why, the prosecution arose:In 2004, the female victim came to the United States from the Philippines. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 8:13 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The ruling is an important one for employers on race discrimination issues and dress/grooming codes. *** In E.E.O.C. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 1:16 pm by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Additional Resources: Nursing home workers condemn Baker budget cuts, July 14, 2016, By Kay Lazar, The Boston Globe More Blog Entries: Nickerson v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 9:44 am by David Urban
  In general, it requires reasonable accommodation of employees’ religious grooming and practices, unless accommodation would impose an “undue hardship. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 11:01 am by Howard Friedman
The court recommended dismissal of his complaint regarding occasional denial of food to break the fast during Ramadan, and his claim that denial of call outs was in retaliation for not complying with the prison grooming policy.In Holland v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 8:15 am by Joy Waltemath
Moreover, the EEOC enforcement guidance states that expert testimony about substantial limitations is not required. [read post]