Search for: "State v. Grooms" Results 161 - 180 of 438
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2016, 1:16 pm by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Additional Resources: Nursing home workers condemn Baker budget cuts, July 14, 2016, By Kay Lazar, The Boston Globe More Blog Entries: Nickerson v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 9:44 am by David Urban
  In general, it requires reasonable accommodation of employees’ religious grooming and practices, unless accommodation would impose an “undue hardship. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 11:01 am by Howard Friedman
The court recommended dismissal of his complaint regarding occasional denial of food to break the fast during Ramadan, and his claim that denial of call outs was in retaliation for not complying with the prison grooming policy.In Holland v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 8:15 am by Joy Waltemath
Moreover, the EEOC enforcement guidance states that expert testimony about substantial limitations is not required. [read post]
9 May 2016, 6:46 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Thompson (Prisoners – Grooming Policies) on May 2, 2016. [read post]
4 May 2016, 3:36 pm by 802050david
Thompson (Prisoners – Grooming Policies) on May 2, 2016. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 8:41 am by Marty Lederman
 Petitioners also state that separate "insurance cards" are necessary. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 11:05 am by L. Julius M. Turman
Supreme Court settled the issue as to whether an accommodation needs to be specifically requested by holding in EEOC v. [read post]