Search for: "State v. Guthrie" Results 41 - 60 of 176
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2016, 3:27 pm by Harold O'Grady
The conviction was later upheld in United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 4:22 am by SHG
  Or, more accurately, yes, we could, but not after People v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 2:13 pm by Andy Taylor
Guthrie, 373 Ark. 443, 447, 284 S.W.3d 455, 457 (2008), George v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 7:08 am by Joy Waltemath
The nurse had texted to his girlfriend that the plaintiff was being treated for a sexually transmitted disease, an action the state court had found neither reasonably foreseeable nor within the scope of the nurse’s employment (Doe v Guthrie Clinic, Ltd, January 27, 2014, per curiam). [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 12:22 pm by Will Baude
  So one frequently-used example comes from the Supreme Court's opinion in Coyle v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 5:31 pm by Michelle N. Meyer
One might have thought that the Court went out of its way to avoid finding that the primary purpose of the DNA collection at issue is “to detect evidence of ordinary criminal wrongdoing,” (Indianapolis v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 2:29 pm by Lisa Baird
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit posed to the New York State Court of Appeals last month when it requested an advisory opinion from the state’s highest court in order to resolve Doe v. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 9:32 pm by Joseph Lazzarotti
In this case (Doe v Guthrie Clinic, Ltd, March 25, 2013), the Second Circuit Court of Appeals (covering New York, Connecticut and Vermont) is asking New York's highest court to determine whether the common law permits a medical corporation to be sued for a breach of the fiduciary duty of confidentiality concerning patient medical records when a non-physician employee makes an unauthorized disclosure of those records. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 6:11 am by Marissa Miller
This blog’s Shelby County v. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 8:28 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
I wanted to follow-up from my brief post, earlier this week, about Tuesday's motions hearing in Minnesota v. [read post]