Search for: "State v. Guthrie"
Results 41 - 60
of 176
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2016, 5:00 am
In its recent non-precedential decision in the case of Coughlin v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 6:26 am
UNITE HERE Local 100 v. [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 3:27 pm
The conviction was later upheld in United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
The Court had just decided Griswold v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 5:58 pm
The court relied on the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Heien v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 4:22 am
Or, more accurately, yes, we could, but not after People v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 10:04 am
Guthrie v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 2:13 pm
Guthrie, 373 Ark. 443, 447, 284 S.W.3d 455, 457 (2008), George v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 8:46 am
See Public Utilities Code § 2891.1, also People v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 10:27 am
In a recent case, Winslett v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 4:18 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 7:08 am
The nurse had texted to his girlfriend that the plaintiff was being treated for a sexually transmitted disease, an action the state court had found neither reasonably foreseeable nor within the scope of the nurse’s employment (Doe v Guthrie Clinic, Ltd, January 27, 2014, per curiam). [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 12:22 pm
So one frequently-used example comes from the Supreme Court's opinion in Coyle v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 10:42 am
The case of Smith v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 5:31 pm
One might have thought that the Court went out of its way to avoid finding that the primary purpose of the DNA collection at issue is “to detect evidence of ordinary criminal wrongdoing,” (Indianapolis v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 2:29 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit posed to the New York State Court of Appeals last month when it requested an advisory opinion from the state’s highest court in order to resolve Doe v. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 9:32 pm
In this case (Doe v Guthrie Clinic, Ltd, March 25, 2013), the Second Circuit Court of Appeals (covering New York, Connecticut and Vermont) is asking New York's highest court to determine whether the common law permits a medical corporation to be sued for a breach of the fiduciary duty of confidentiality concerning patient medical records when a non-physician employee makes an unauthorized disclosure of those records. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 6:11 am
This blog’s Shelby County v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:48 pm
Justice Goepel in Guthrie v. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 8:28 am
I wanted to follow-up from my brief post, earlier this week, about Tuesday's motions hearing in Minnesota v. [read post]
