Search for: "State v. Guthrie"
Results 81 - 100
of 178
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2008, 10:51 am
Case Name: Rogers v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:31 pm
" [Redwing v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 7:35 am
Henry v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 10:27 am
In a recent case, Winslett v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 6:26 am
UNITE HERE Local 100 v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
In the case of Moravia Motorcycle, Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 5:00 am
In the case of Sycalik v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:48 pm
Justice Goepel in Guthrie v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 10:42 am
Case Name: Gray v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:28 am
This can be seen in the 1984, First District Court of Appeals opinion styled, Guthrie v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 6:11 am
This blog’s Shelby County v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 5:39 pm
In his recent Opinion in the case of Cubakovic v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:43 pm
Repko v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 5:35 am
Boyer of the Venango County Court of Common Pleas recently issued an April 24, 2010 Opinion and Order in the case of Heller v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:38 pm
Strobel and State Farm Mut. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 11:45 am
’State v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 7:46 am
The decline has been even steeper in federal district courts.Cases like Florida v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 4:28 am
United States, centering on an appeal of a restitution award. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 5:31 pm
One might have thought that the Court went out of its way to avoid finding that the primary purpose of the DNA collection at issue is “to detect evidence of ordinary criminal wrongdoing,” (Indianapolis v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 5:29 am
I just finished reading an intriguing essay by Tracey George and Chris Guthrie (forthcoming in Duke Law Journal) arguing for a change to the structure of the Supreme Court, primarily by expanding the size of the Court (to 15 justices) and having most cases argued and decided in panels of three (with an en banc process for important cases, including those in which a state or federal law is challenged on constitutional grounds). [read post]
