Search for: "State v. Hale" Results 21 - 40 of 876
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2017, 7:59 am by ASAD KHAN
Applying in Bah v UK (2012) 54 EHRR 21 he held that the discrimination was justified on the facts of HC’s case. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 10:19 am
There only one case listed in the Supreme Court this week: Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government v Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 4:18 am
On Monday and Tuesday 17 to 18 January 2011 Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, and Lords Mance, Collins and Clarke will hear Duncombe and others v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:46 am by EMMA FOUBISTER, MATRIX
In July 2017, the Supreme Court (sitting in a panel comprising Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Carnwath and Lord Hughes) heard this appeal relating to whether, in the context of awarding Jobseeker’s Allowance (‘JSA’), the State unjustifiably interfered with the right of transgender persons to have information about their gender reassignment kept private. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 12:29 pm by Jeffrey Kahn
Supreme Court described it in Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 9:50 am by Patricia Salkin
The Hales were owners of a house on agricultural land about one mile southeast of a shooting range in Ward County, which is used to train local, state, and federal law enforcement officers. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 10:12 pm by Patricia Salkin
Hale v Ward County, 2012 WL 2849677 (N.D. 7/12/2012) The opinion can be accessed at: http://www.ndcourts.gov/court/opinions/20110171.htm Filed under: Current Caselaw, Nuisance, Takings [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 1:17 am by EMMA FOUBISTER, MATRIX
On 1 November 2017, the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal in R (C) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2017] UKSC 72, relating to whether, in the context of awarding Jobseeker’s Allowance (‘JSA’), the State unjustifiably interfered with the right of transgender persons to have information about their gender reassignment kept private. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:28 am by Evan Schaeffer
State Farm; appeal and motion for class certification filed"-- A lawsuit alleging fraudulent activity in Avery v. [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 12:41 pm
S. 61 (1975) (per curiam)United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:00 am by Guy Stuckey-Clarke, Olswang LLP
In November 2000, the High Court (Laws LJ and Gibbs J) gave judgment in favour of Mr Bancoult, a Chagos Islander, in granting a High Court order quashing the Immigration Ordinance 1971, s 4; see R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2001] QB 1067 (“Bancoult (1)”). [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:00 am by ASAD KHAN
Albeit somewhat reluctantly, Lady Hale agreed that the appeal had to be dismissed. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 4:21 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The post Case Comment: R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] UKSC 39 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
Up until this case, that position had support in domestic law (see AL (Serbia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 42, [2008] 4 All ER 1127; R (Hooper) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 29, [2006] 1 All ER 487; and R (S) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [2004] UKHL 39, [2004] 4 All ER 193). [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 3:29 pm
S. 186, 189, 204–208 (1946) (payroll records); Hale v. [read post]