Search for: "State v. Hale" Results 61 - 80 of 876
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2017, 7:00 am by JONATHAN GLASSON QC, MATRIX
In these cases, which certainly include D and V, a proper criminal investigation by the state is required. [read post]
Background Last week the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 4:45 am by Sean O'Beirne, Kingsley Napley LLP
On 23 November 2015 the Supreme Court heard a two day appeal of the decision in R (Nouazli) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWCA Civ 1608. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 4:33 am by Grace Capel
The post Case Preview: Al-Jedda v Secretary of State for the Home Department appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:29 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Starting on Monday 2 July 2012 in the Supreme Court is the two day appeal of Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and anor v Yunus Rahmatullah in front of a panel of seven (L Phillips, L Hale, L Kerr, L Dyson, L Wilson, L Reed, L Carnwath). [read post]
11 May 2010, 12:26 pm by David Walk
Specifically, we are happy to report about a fine example of a federal court applying common sense, in Hale v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:39 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor, heard 4 November 2011. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 5:44 am
Hall, a 1979 Supreme Court ruling that said a state could be haled into another state’s courts without its consent, should be overruled. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 2:22 pm by David Wilson
With the recent decision in Winrose Homeowners’ Association, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 7:01 am by Dan Ernst
Meares, Walton Hale Hamilton Professor of Law at Yale University, delivered the 12th annual Robert H. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 3:54 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Lord Hale stated the appellant was clearly entitled to a declaration that the application of the settlement criterion breached her rights under art 14 and A2P1 of the convention. [read post]
On Monday and Tuesday, the 3 and 4 December 2018, the Supreme Court (Lady Hale, Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath, and Lord Lloyd-Jones) will hear Privacy International’s appeal (UKSC 2018/0004) against the Court of Appeal’s decision in R (Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal ([2017] EWCA Civ 1868; [2018] 1 WLR 2572), which found that the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (“RIPA 2000”), s 67(8)… [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 5:19 am by Aidan Wills, Matrix
Applying the recent ECHR cases of Genovese v Malta (2012) App no. 53124/09 and Kuric v Slovenia (2012) App no. 26828/06, Lady Hale held that ECHR, art 8 is engaged because the denial of citizenship significantly affects a person’s social identity. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 2:14 am by Laura Sandwell
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor, heard 4 November 2011. [read post]