Search for: "State v. Hale" Results 81 - 100 of 876
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2018, 7:25 am by Dennis Crouch
Hall, 440 U.S. 410 (1979), which permits a sovereign State to be haled into another State’s courts without its consent, should be overruled. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:15 am by Laura Sandwell
Starting on Monday 13 February 2012 is the two day appeal of R (on the application of ST (Eritrea)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department in front of a panel of seven (L Hale, L Hope, L Brown, L Mance, L Kerr, L Clarke and L Dyson). [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:00 am by Alice Grainger, Levison Meltzer Pigott
In terms of materiality, he considered the House of Lords’ decision in Livesey (formerly Jenkins) v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:14 pm by PaulKostro
In adopting the Shield Law, New Jersey’s Legislature accepted an invitation by the United States Supreme Court in Branzburg v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am by Kirsten Sjvoll, Matrix Chambers
Comment This case is significant for two reasons: First, it tasks the Supreme Court with answering the question raised obiter by Lady Hale in Savage v South Essex NHS Trust [2009] 1 AC 653, namely “what is the extent of the state’s duty to protect all people against an immediate risk of self-harm?”. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:19 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v SSHD, W & BB v SSHD and Z, G, U & Y v SSHD, heard 30 – 31 January 2012. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 5:34 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Schwab applies Restatement (Second) of Torts in products case given that Third Circuit's predictions have not come to pass).Source:  Article by Saranac Hale-Spencer, "Judge Adds to Restatement Rift Among Federal Courts in State." [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 4:05 am
Cases brought against Ford by Hale and the other three passengers are still pending, so Ford's bill for Hale's carelessness is only going to go up. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm by Blog Editorial
From Monday 7 to Wednesday 9 March 2011, Lords Phillips and Walker, Lady Hale, and Lords Mance and Collins will hear Lucasfilm Limited and others v Ainsworth and another. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 7:01 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Dollar General Corp v MI Band of Choctaw Indians_HALE An excerpt: The State has joined in support of the Petitioner despite the fact that the State of Mississippi has made the policy decision that on-reservation torts arising in Mississippi should not consume State resources and are better addressed by tribal institutions. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 3:38 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Lady Hale, dissenting, stated that what has to be considered is whether the benefit cap as it applies to lone parents can be justified independently of its discriminatory effects. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 10:37 am
Not for the first time, Nearly Legal has drawn my attention to the case of Holmes-Moorhouse v LB Richmond upon Thames, this time as it reaches the House of Lords. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
Baroness Hale states that the phrase ‘would be reasonable for him to continue to occupy’ looks to the future as well as describing a current state. [read post]