Search for: "State v. Hale"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,071
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2020, 2:30 am
The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the Secretary of State’s appeal. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:18 am
STATE V. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm
Tuesday morning’s argument in Bristol-Myers Squibb v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 3:53 am
Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, as authority for its determination.In Hale the Circuit Court said that FMLA’s abrogation of states’ sovereign immunity to suits regarding employees’ own health conditions exceeded Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment.Judge Gleeson also commented that Lambert’s FMLA claim against the individual defendants was inappropriate, noting a decision by the Eleventh Circuit holding that individual state… [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 2:59 pm
AOAO of the Hanohano Hale Foreclosure: First Hawaiian Bank v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 2:59 pm
AOAO of the Hanohano Hale Foreclosure: First Hawaiian Bank v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 2:49 pm
The National Law Journal features the Smith v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 9:28 am
By Christopher Hale A recent decision by the U.S. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 5:16 am
ColbIn Justice Alito's (SA's) leaked opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 9:20 pm
Here's the abstract:Kiobel v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 4:55 am
Also see R (SG) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 16, at paras 105-106 [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am
This principle was famously laid down in the case of Sidhu v British Airways (where passengers could not sue at common law for harm resulting from their plane having been high jacked following the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait), and subsequently applied by senior courts around the world, including notably the United States Supreme Court in El Al Israel Airlines v Tseng (though Justice Stevens there dissented). [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm
United States New York state’s highest court will consider whether U.S. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 2:22 am
They stated that the Court had no hesitation in concluding that it should do so in the present case. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:37 am
” Supported by the interveners – Bail for Immigration Detainees and Medical Justice – O successfully argued that the authority of R (Francis) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Bail for Immigration Detainees intervening) [2014] EWCA Civ 718 had been wrongly decided. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 2:49 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Dan Greenberg (The Arkansas Project) notes that the report of United States v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 7:48 am
Lady Hale reviewed the authorities at domestic and CJEU level (the latter consisting of no fewer than 12 cases from Mangold v Helm [2006] 1 CML 1132 to and Case C-447/09 Prigge & Ors v Deutsche Lufthansa AG [2011] IRLR 1052). [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm
The leading judgment for the majority was given by Lord Sumption, with a concurring judgment delivered by Lady Hale. [read post]
10 May 2010, 4:12 am
Although the Supreme Court previously stated, in Faretta v. [read post]
