Search for: "State v. Hall" Results 61 - 80 of 4,169
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2023, 4:28 pm by Kalvis Golde
Hall 23-317Issue: Whether the objective-reasonableness test of Kingsley v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved  Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name,… [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 1:40 am by Frank Cranmer
Simon Hoare, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (and, we learned, the Government’s Minister for Faith), replied. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 6:14 am by Frank Cranmer
The background In Asociación de Abogados Cristianos v Spain [2023] ECHR no. 22604/18, the applicants complained about an exhibition by an artist called “A.A. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:57 am by Beatrice Yahia
State Department, Matthew Miller, said today. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Anna Price
Earlier this year, Bowie State University held a town hall where students and the public collaboratively discussed recommendations for the vacant land. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
The United States now uses a life + 70 copyright regime, but only for works created on and after January 1, 1978. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Michael Bender and Anjali Huynh (New York Times) | Published: 11/29/2023 Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:08 am by Eugene Volokh
The opinion also notes that, "In addition to moderating users' posts, the policy also authorizes the Department 'to remove, and if needed block, anyone who posts inappropriate material,'" and notes: [S]ome courts have held that indefinitely suspending a disruptive person from attending future public forums—a city hall and a state Capitol building—because of past acts is unconstitutional, particularly when no threat to public safety exists. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 12:40 am by Immigration Prof
Desecration by Duane Rudolph, Seton Hall Law Review, Vol. 53, No. 1173, 2023 Abstract This Article focuses on two cases from the Supreme Court of the United States dealing with sexual orientation—Bowers v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 6:55 pm by Will Baude
 at 1794 n.14 (citing Lisa Kahaleole Hall, Strategies of Erasure: U.S. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:37 am by David Pocklington
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]