Search for: "State v. Hannah"
Results 1 - 20
of 336
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2025, 5:55 am
In Trump v. [read post]
26 Apr 2025, 10:26 am
The complaint is here: US v. [read post]
18 Apr 2025, 3:17 pm
” Interpreting the US Supreme Court’s decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
11 Apr 2025, 6:25 am
Inter-American Court of Human RightsPaillama v. [read post]
10 Mar 2025, 3:18 am
Rather than creating a “backdoor” to comply, Apple withdrew ADP from the UK market, stating it would not compromise its security features and expressing disappointment at the decision. [read post]
6 Mar 2025, 6:07 am
Morrison v. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 6:55 am
” On her first day in office, Attorney General Pam Bondi issued this memorandum stating that “State and local actors may not impede, obstruct, or otherwise fail to comply with lawful immigration-related directives pursuant to the President's Article II authority to ensure national security, the Immigration and Nationality Act, or other authorities. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 10:33 am
Her commitment to equal education predated Brown v. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 3:58 am
On 7 February 2025, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC) heard argument over the release to the media of documents from the case of H6 v Secretary of State for the Home Department (SC/205/2023). [read post]
23 Jan 2025, 1:52 pm
In Sullivan v. [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 1:59 am
It says a great deal about the state of modern journalism and its unrelenting efforts at self-destruction. [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 6:48 am
See Uieky v. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 1:25 am
United States On 2 December 2024, judgment was handed down dismissing the appeal in State of Washington v Meta Platforms, Inc., — P.3d —, 2024 WL 4929812 (Wash. [read post]
26 Nov 2024, 6:49 pm
In the anti-enforcement context, some scholars have treated fraud as a distinct category of case that may justify the grant of an injunction: see, most recently, Hannah L Buxbaum and Ralf Michaels “Anti-enforcement injunctions” [2024] 56 NYU Journal of International Law and Politics 101 at 110-111, citing Ellerman Lines Ltd v Read [1928] 2 KB 144 (CA) in support. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 6:00 am
The CBA further provides that the CSEA may request arbitration with respect to a grievance, but no provision in the CBA permits an employee to request arbitration, nor is there a provision that makes the employees a party to the collective bargaining agreement (see generally Matter of Case v Monroe Community Coll., 89 NY2d 438, 442-443 [1997]; Matter of Diaz v Pilgrim State Psychiatric Ctr. of State of N.Y., 62 NY2d 693, 695 [1984]). [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 6:00 am
The CBA further provides that the CSEA may request arbitration with respect to a grievance, but no provision in the CBA permits an employee to request arbitration, nor is there a provision that makes the employees a party to the collective bargaining agreement (see generally Matter of Case v Monroe Community Coll., 89 NY2d 438, 442-443 [1997]; Matter of Diaz v Pilgrim State Psychiatric Ctr. of State of N.Y., 62 NY2d 693, 695 [1984]). [read post]
28 Oct 2024, 11:44 am
–Ticketmaster v. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 4:00 am
As a consequence, many have come to view mainstream media as a de facto state media. [read post]
26 Sep 2024, 4:00 am
The editors’ stated intention, arguably achieved, is to invite further scholarly communication on the topic. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 3:00 am
Since the fall of Roe v. [read post]
