Search for: "State v. Harden" Results 1 - 20 of 332
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am by Norman L. Eisen
(Some media reports state he was holding up a small crucifix.) [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
That is, public policy does not drive economic production (its character and choices); rather public policy creates the "playing field" within those choices can be made in conformity to collective expectations, duties, and obligations (some of which are written into law especially in the guise of compliance measures and "hardened" private law; see also here). [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:21 am by centerforartlaw
So this was different from the troop of Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, looting during the 16th century. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Whenever I teach the federalism portion of my first-year constitutional law course, at least one cynical (but clever) student observes that the juxtaposition between United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:44 am by Daniel J. Gilman
Consumers are reluctant to change behaviors that have hardened into habit, he said. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 7:07 am
Eventually, however,  the impulse to categorization (1) may again embrace a more hardened male-female binary (eg here) in advancing equality principles, or (2) it may embrace a spectrum categorization with a transforming effect on sport from dual to multiple competitive categories (that may then spill over to all aspects of social relations); or (3) categorization will itself be rejected as impossible and in the process take with it a substantial quantum of the presumptions and… [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 10:50 am by Giles Peaker
Katie-Leigh Webb-Harnden v London Borough of Waltham Forest (2023) EWCA Civ 992 This was the second appeal from a review decision upholding the suitability of an offer of a private sector tenancy in Walsall in discharge of Waltham Forest’s s.193 duty to Ms Webb-Harden. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
A: this is part of the challenge—innovation folks usually don’t have to think about public law and state v. federal. [read post]