Search for: "State v. Hardy"
Results 21 - 40
of 452
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2023, 3:55 pm
Welcome back to the Cost Corner, where we provide practical insight into the complex cost and pricing regulations that apply to Government contractors. [read post]
23 May 2023, 10:22 am
Hardy v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 7:46 am
Before the state bar could reach that conclusion, they would have to do more work to validate that the 236 entries are indeed misdirected, something this court punted on. [read post]
19 May 2023, 8:53 am
GOSLING and HARDY. [read post]
13 May 2023, 7:30 am
The defendant is the Bye, Goff firm, based in River Falls, Wisconsin with other in-state offices. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 11:23 am
For services that are “of a type” offered and sold competitively in substantial quantities in the commercial marketplace, the contracting officer must determine that the offeror has submitted sufficient information to evaluate price reasonableness through price analysis.[38] For DoD, NASA, and the Coast Guard, minor modifications to commercial products that do not change the commercial product to other than commercial are exempt from the requirement to submit certified cost or pricing… [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am
IPSO 11161-22 Park’s of Hamilton Limited v The Scottish Sun, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of adjudication 11822-21 Law v express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 02114-22 Bird v thesun.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 11120-22 Cozens-Hardy v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 11319-22… [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:39 am
[Government officials] are to be treated as "men of fortitude, able to thrive in a hardy climate" …. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
If you just blithely ignore it, and publish the story despite having been told that it may well be mistaken, that would be textbook "reckless disregard," which would allow liability even in a public official case: Consider, for instance, Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:59 pm
” Slip op. at 62 (quoting from Gerber v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 11:57 am
In re Hardy, 787 F.3d 1189, 1192 (8th Cir. 2015); accord Law v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Yet, as Bush v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
Ethics Comm. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 6:07 pm
For more, see the opinion (Netflix, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 1:15 am
The principle that characters which evolve over time don’t enter the public domain all at once was established by the 2014 opinion in Klinger v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
Brown, 2022 SCC 18 [2] At common law, automatism is “a state of impaired consciousness, rather than unconsciousness, in which an individual, though capable of action, has no voluntary control over that action” (R. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 8:43 am
In support of that conclusion, the court makes this murky statement: “courts in this Circuit have repeatedly held that a plaintiff may state a claim under the Lanham Act where the defendant (1) interfered with the plaintiff’s ability to offer its own commercial services, and/or (2) used the Internet. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Hardy Callcott, Corin R. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 4:40 am
Rather, Hardie M. [read post]
