Search for: "State v. Harling" Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2020, 7:21 am by Denise Harle
Denise Harle is legal counsel with the Alliance Defending Freedom Center for Life (@AllianceDefends), which filed an amicus brief on behalf of Louisiana legislators in June Medical Services v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 9:05 am by Erin Miller
Karlan is the Kenneth and Harle Montgomery Professor of Public Interest Law at Stanford and co-director of the Supreme Court Litigation Clinic there. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 1:49 pm by Erin Miller
Below, Pamela Karlan, Kenneth and Harle Montgomery Professor of Public Interest Law at Stanford Law School and founding director of the school’s Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, writes on Brown v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 8:09 am by Steve Hall
Morton and his lawyers asked Harle, a Bexar County state district judge, to launch an unprecedented court of inquiry to determine whether Ken Anderson broke state laws and violated professional ethics codes by withholding evidence when he prosecuted Morton. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 7:13 am by Steve Hall
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 9:54 am by Michael Lowe
Judge Sid Harle and the Court of Inquiry Ken Anderson didn’t throw the first punch here; his brief with its exhibits is filed in response to a report presented to the Honorable Sid Harle, a district court judge out of San Antonio who was appointed by Texas Supreme Court Chief Justice Wallace Jefferson to preside over The State of Texas v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 10:55 am by Pamela S. Karlan
Department of Justice (where she received the Attorney General’s Award for Exceptional Service – the department’s highest award for employee performance – as part of the team responsible for implementing the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
” At Law360 (subscription required), Denise Harle weighs in on June Medical Services v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 9:45 am by Steve Hall
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
” At CNS News, Denise Harle weighs in on in June Medical Services v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed for The San Diego Union-Tribune, Denise Harle maintains that “all Americans should consider it great news that the Supreme Court is taking a hard look at the Reproductive FACT Act” in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 1:13 am
Almost immediately after the May 29 decision in Ledbetter v. [read post]