Search for: "State v. Harmon"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,098
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2023, 3:46 am
As part of efforts related to international leadership, the EO also directs the Secretary of State to establish a plan for global engagement on prompting and developing AI standards. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:29 pm
To be sure, the purpose of the IFR is to seek to comply with a 2021 Supreme Court decision, United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 3:26 am
That was the question before the Court of King’s Bench of Alberta in Wirring v Law Society of Alberta 2023 ABKB 580 (CanLII). [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:38 pm
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar; Professor of Law and International Affairs Pennsylvania State University 239 Lewis Katz Building, University Park, PA 16802 1.814.863.3640 (direct) lcb11@psu.edu Abstract: Humans create but do not regulate generative systems of data based programs (so-called “artificial” intelligence (“A.I.) and generative predictive analytics and its models. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 12:25 pm
Cap Export, LLC v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:00 pm
In Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 12:00 pm
The report paints a picture of a harmonized but not yet quite harmonious EU trade secret landscape, where litigation trends are clearly visible but the practical differences between Member States still exist. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 1:30 pm
In Hamilton v. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 10:18 am
This will pave the way for nations to harmonize these core cybercrimes across the world and to easily assist others in surveillance on targets related to these crimes. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:11 pm
One major concern we have raised within this debate is that, when seeking to harmonize safeguards, there is a race to the bottom of human rights protections. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:11 pm
One major concern we have raised within this debate is that, when seeking to harmonize safeguards, there is a race to the bottom of human rights protections. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 5:00 am
Welfare Com. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 10:00 pm
For her, the CJEU’s decisions ‘have contributed greatly to the overall EU harmonization project’. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 2:23 pm
Ginsberg v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:39 am
” In Johns v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
As one commenter stated: “In the hours and days following a cybersecurity breach, companies must quickly and efficiently contain, minimize, and remedy any damage or loss resultin [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 12:30 am
Such a provision would go against the high standards adopted by the ECtHR and the Council of Europe’s recommendations, which severely restrict the cases under which journalists can be compelled to reveal their sources (see for example the judgments in Voskuil v. the Netherlands and Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands). [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
In Gomez v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Federal and state rules already require reporting of most Scope 1 emissions, including the pollution from power plants that are others’ Scope 2 emissions. [read post]
