Search for: "State v. Harp" Results 1 - 20 of 106
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2024, 1:14 pm by Anna E. Bullock
In July 2021, the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in National Collegiate Athletic Association v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:24 pm by Dennis Aftergut
Voters have consistently rebelled against the Supreme Court’s June 2022 Dobbs decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm by Guest Author
   Take another example: the Clean Power Plan overturned by the Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Today, small rural states with less diverse populations benefit from state equality in the Senate. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 4:16 am by SHG
Most anti-abortion people are hung up on the question of whether Roe v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 8:01 am by Katrina Eiland
The United States has made a commitment — by law and by treaty — to protect people who come to this country fleeing persecution. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 7:29 am by Andrew Crespo
To say as much might seem like harping on semantics or, worse, like picking on Cline for speaking inartfully. [read post]
21 Sep 2019, 9:30 am
  An entity whose existence is recognized under South Carolina secular law does not cease to exist, or become some new entity altogether, simply because it changes its religious affiliation.To readers of this blog, I apologize for seeming to harp on the same point again and again. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:04 pm
  An entity whose existence is recognized under South Carolina secular law does not cease to exist, or become some new entity altogether, simply because it changes its religious affiliation.To readers of this blog, I apologize for seeming to harp on the same point again and again. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:37 am by SHG
Given the state of the law on border searches of electronic devices, Judge Edward Korman issued a practical, if unsatisfactory, warning in Abidor v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:47 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
[ii] On the pages of this wonderful platform, Scott has allowed me to harp on sentencing disparity before. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 2:02 am
In the absence of the PVC, an eligible voter who was prevented from voting cannot harp on his/her right to vote as he/she has no right to vote in such circumstances. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 3:41 am by SHG
Not to harp on law, but as the Supreme Court in Davis v. [read post]