Search for: "State v. Harp" Results 21 - 40 of 106
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2010, 3:40 am by Russ Bensing
Two years ago, in State v. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 2:35 pm by Giles Peaker
On the engagement of Art 8, Kugathas v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2003] EWCA Civ 31 was followed, per Seldley LJ: “Mr. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 2:02 am
In the absence of the PVC, an eligible voter who was prevented from voting cannot harp on his/her right to vote as he/she has no right to vote in such circumstances. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 8:23 am
He assumed, as most experts do, that the decision would apply to the states. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:49 am
Advocate General Szpunar, in his opinion in Hauck, states at the referred to passage (emphasis added):99. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 10:13 pm
Alfonso, 759 F.2d at 736; United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 12:23 pm by Adam Levitin
  The Street seemed heartened by a Maine Supreme Judicial Court decision that came out on Friday, Harp v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 10:51 am by Beck, et al.
(referring to the state’s adoption of Canterbury v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 5:55 pm
Harp    Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 08a0291n.06 Parma v. [read post]