Search for: "State v. Harp"
Results 61 - 80
of 106
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2019, 9:30 am
An entity whose existence is recognized under South Carolina secular law does not cease to exist, or become some new entity altogether, simply because it changes its religious affiliation.To readers of this blog, I apologize for seeming to harp on the same point again and again. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:04 pm
An entity whose existence is recognized under South Carolina secular law does not cease to exist, or become some new entity altogether, simply because it changes its religious affiliation.To readers of this blog, I apologize for seeming to harp on the same point again and again. [read post]
4 May 2007, 12:37 pm
More on this to follow.Not space law per se, but for you patent junkies, here's a recap of this week's Supreme Court decision in KSR v. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 5:47 am
Down in Columbus, an important criminal decision in State v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 3:59 am
It's in the Wall Street Journal and here is the key portion:Defenders of the court's decision in Kennedy v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 10:00 pm
"In Pantages v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 7:30 am
Howard v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 2:14 pm
After three published opinions in Conits v. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 8:38 am
In the case of Allison v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 8:01 am
The United States has made a commitment — by law and by treaty — to protect people who come to this country fleeing persecution. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 4:02 pm
In my view, harping on about the size of the award in Leech has the capacity to undermine the case for reform of damages awards. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 8:06 am
In short, as described by Harlow v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 10:43 am
” And he quickly brought up a prior precedent (South Dakota v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:47 am
[ii] On the pages of this wonderful platform, Scott has allowed me to harp on sentencing disparity before. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:09 pm
We also felt that way while we were involved in the Fagan v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 9:34 pm
As has been stated, the rewards shall also stand transferred along with the risk in a sale transaction. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 7:29 am
To say as much might seem like harping on semantics or, worse, like picking on Cline for speaking inartfully. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
Tyrrell and Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 3:05 pm
State v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 10:36 am
(Aside for non-lawyers: “diverse” = plaintiff and defendants are citizens of different states; “non-diverse” = citizens of same state on both sides of the “v. [read post]
