Search for: "State v. Harris" Results 121 - 140 of 5,666
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm by Unknown
Tribal rights, water rights, states’ rights and the Colorado River: What’s at stake in the SCOTUS case, Arizona v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
To that end, this Essay analyzes an undisturbed line of Supreme Court cases from 1980-1990 – United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Out-of-state employers, insurers, employee benefit plan vendors, and other businesses registered to do business in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, or another state that requires that out-of-state businesses consent to jurisdiction as a condition of their registration to do business in the state face a heightened risk of getting hauled into court in the consent to jurisdiction state following last month’s Supreme Court decision in… [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Stronski, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Tuesday, July 11, 2023 Tags: Board composition, directors, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC enforcement, Shareholder activism, universal proxy rule X Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Stronski, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Tuesday, July 11, 2023 Tags: Board composition, directors, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC enforcement, Shareholder activism, universal proxy rule X Corp. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:41 pm by Bill Marler
Harris, JP, et al., “Deaths from Norovirus among the Elderly, England and Wales,” EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, Vol. 14, No. 10, pp. 1548-1552 (Oct. 2008). [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Josephine A. Phillips
Nebraska, ruled in favor of six states that objected to a Biden-Harris Administration decision to cancel up to $400 billion in federal student loans. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
Lawyers for MGN told the court the company has “paid a very heavy price” for the hacking scandal, while advocates for Prince Harry argued he was entitled to £320,000 in aggravated damages. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:57 am by Austin Sarat
”As he put it, “When the constitutionality of COVID restrictions has been challenged in court, the leading authority cited in their defense is a 1905 Supreme Court decision called Jacobson v. [read post]