Search for: "State v. Harsh" Results 61 - 80 of 2,654
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2020, 6:18 am by Siyabonga Mathe
The state should not use the courts as a means to muzzle or stifle the freedom of its citizens to criticise government, no matter how harsh it may be perceived to be. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 5:00 am by Alan E. Sherman
Last Friday, the Third Court of Appeals in Austin issued its memorandum opinion in Milazzo v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm by Bernard Bell
United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. 407 F.Supp.3d 311 (D.D.C. 2019); Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:09 am by AYESHA CHRISTIE, MATRIX
The court confirmed that a proportionality test (and not an exceptionality test) must be applied, but, as in Hesham Ali, required “appropriate weight” to be given to the Secretary of State’s immigration policy that a person in breach of immigration law must show insurmountable obstacles, or exceptional circumstances (defined as “unjustifiably harsh consequences”), for the public interest in immigration control to be outweighed. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 10:31 am
The decision was made two months ago, but I think the written opinion has just become available, as GW v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 6:27 am
Accordingly, New Jersey law is very harsh on those cited for tailgating in the state. [read post]