Search for: "State v. Hathaway" Results 61 - 80 of 255
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Walter Olson
AU Optronics: is state attorney general’s parens patriae antitrust suit removable to federal court under CAFA? [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:26 pm by Matthew Nelson
  Justice Davis’ decision was joined by Justice Hathaway in its entirety. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 10:18 am by Julie Lam
 Justices Marilyn Kelly and Hathaway would reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals in Estate of Joseph A Clock v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 11:49 am
Justices Kelly and Hathaway dissented and stated that they would have denied judges discretion over the appearance of persons whose clothing is dictated by their religion. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 2:04 pm by Nicole Mazzocco
Chief Justice Kelly dissented, joined by Justices Cavanagh and Hathaway. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 8:44 am
On July 31, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court issued its opinion in People v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 11:38 am
On Thursday, August 20, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court  granted a motion for reconsideration in McCormick v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 8:50 am by Tess Bridgeman
It grew more complex as an array of state and non-state actors took sides in Assad’s civil war and terrorist groups also began vying for territory and control. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 10:05 am
On July 31, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court released its opinion in Potter v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  She is pictured with another Honorary Fellow, David V. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 10:03 am by Madelaine Lane
  Justice Davis authored the concurring opinion, joined by Justice Hathaway. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 12:09 am by Orin Kerr
Carter, 682 S.E.2d 416 (N.C.App. 2009); Hathaway v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 12:19 pm by Steven M. Gursten
Thanks to the addition of Diane Hathaway to the Michigan Supreme Court, the court came to its senses on 7/31 and lowered the (personal injury) “Threshold” for victims in auto crashes (with McCormick v. [read post]