Search for: "State v. Hathaway" Results 81 - 100 of 256
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Walter Olson
AU Optronics: is state attorney general’s parens patriae antitrust suit removable to federal court under CAFA? [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 10:05 am by Raffaela Wakeman
After all, we have one commander in chief at a time, and the United States is weakened if our presidency is weakened. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 8:55 am by WSLL
Rosenthal and Marianne Kunz Shanor of Hathaway& Kunz, P.C., Cheyenne, Wyoming. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 6:54 am by Rachel Sachs
On Monday, the Court also heard argument in United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
(v) Where necessary to protect health or safety, a claimant may commence immediate repairs to heating systems, hot water systems, and necessary electrical connections, as well as exterior windows, exterior doors, and, for minor permanent repairs, exterior walls, in order to enable property to retain heat, and any policy requirement that the policyholder exhibit the remains of the property may be satisfied by the policyholder submitting proof of loss documentation of the damaged or destroyed… [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
(v) Where necessary to protect health or safety, a claimant may commence immediate repairs to heating systems, hot water systems, and necessary electrical connections, as well as exterior windows, exterior doors, and, for minor permanent repairs, exterior walls, in order to enable property to retain heat, and any policy requirement that the policyholder exhibit the remains of the property may be satisfied by the policyholder submitting proof of loss documentation of the damaged or destroyed… [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 1:58 am by SHG
Hathaway wrote for the Michigan court majority. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 3:26 pm by Rick Hasen
  But the concurring opinion for three Justices shows how this is really about the Democracy Canon: CAVANAGH, MARILYN KELLY, and HATHAWAY, JJ. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 7:11 am by Eugene Kontorovich
Before responding to particular participants, I should introduce an important intervening precedent – United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:43 pm by Donald Childress
The following response in our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 7:58 am by Conor McEvily
This blog’s online symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]