Search for: "State v. Hauge" Results 1 - 20 of 44
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2014, 6:10 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The former employee Hauge prevailed against his former employer in a contempt/injunction case Energy Recovery v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 2:20 am
Category: Injunctions  By: Christian Hannon, Contributor TitleEnergy Recovery, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:28 pm by Viking
I’m not convinced Daubert (read United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
If substantial evidence supports the administrative tribunal's decision, a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the tribunal Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 2018 NY Slip Op 06964, In deciding Haug v State University of New York at Potsday [Potsdam], a case involving student discipline, the Court of Appeals commented on some issues relevant to the  standard of proof required to support an administrative… [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
If substantial evidence supports the administrative tribunal's decision, a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the tribunal Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 2018 NY Slip Op 06964, In deciding Haug v State University of New York at Potsday [Potsdam], a case involving student discipline, the Court of Appeals commented on some issues relevant to the  standard of proof required to support an administrative… [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
If substantial evidence supports the administrative tribunal's decision, a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the tribunal Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 2018 NY Slip Op 06964, In deciding Haug v State University of New York at Potsday [Potsdam], a case involving student discipline, the Court of Appeals commented on some issues relevant to the  standard of proof required to support an administrative… [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 5:12 am by SHG
The best part of the New York Court of Appeals memorandum opinion in Haug v. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 5:25 am by Eugene Volokh
An interesting court decision in a university sexual misconduct case, decided last week by the New York intermediate appellate court (though quite possibly eventually headed to the New York high court), Matter of Haug v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although the New York State and Local Police and Fire Retirement System [System] conceded that the injury suffered by an applicant for accidental disability retirement benefits was an accident within the meaning of the Retirement and Social Security Law, the System rejected a State Trooper's [Trooper] application for such benefits based on a finding that he is neither permanently disabled nor permanently incapacitated.Following a hearing, a Hearing Officer upheld the… [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although the New York State and Local Police and Fire Retirement System [System] conceded that the injury suffered by an applicant for accidental disability retirement benefits was an accident within the meaning of the Retirement and Social Security Law, the System rejected a State Trooper's [Trooper] application for such benefits based on a finding that he is neither permanently disabled nor permanently incapacitated.Following a hearing, a Hearing Officer upheld the… [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 5:05 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d 1044, the Appellate Division explained that "[T]he substantial evidence standard is a minimal standard" that is "less than a preponderance of the evidence, and demands only that a given inference is reasonable and plausible, not necessarily the most probable. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 5:05 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d 1044, the Appellate Division explained that "[T]he substantial evidence standard is a minimal standard" that is "less than a preponderance of the evidence, and demands only that a given inference is reasonable and plausible, not necessarily the most probable. [read post]