Search for: "State v. Haynes"
Results 261 - 280
of 326
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2010, 10:37 pm
See, e.g., Dyer v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 2:54 pm
Haynes argument 2/22/2010 Wilkins v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 11:49 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:32 pm
Viewpointe was represented by Haynes & Boone and Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:09 am
But I would not stop there — I would certainly add Jim Haynes, as well as career CIA and other agency lawyers whose careers suffered inside government. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
The question in Thaler v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 6:50 pm
Adding to that, over the course of the last few weeks and for the next month, or so, I’ve been prepping and, starting next week, trying a fairly complex sexual assault case remanded for new trial by my state Supreme Court, State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 7:28 am
Haynes (09-2730). [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 7:07 am
[ADDITION, 8 p.m.: The original version of this post did not state that the questions presented in Los Angeles County v. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 9:00 pm
Haynes, __ U.S. _ (Feb. 22, 2010). [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 6:30 am
John Elwood at the Volokh Conspiracy discusses Thaler v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
United States Docket: 09-342 Issues: (1) What constitutes the proper denominator in the takings fraction under Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 11:41 am
Haynes, 09–273, on cert to the Fifth Circuit (panel consisting of Jolly, Dennis, and Clement). [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 8:47 pm
Now consider the Fifth Circuit’s decision yesterday in United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 11:51 pm
Four Paul Hastings Partners Join Haynes and Boone New York Law Journal Four real estate partners are leaving Paul Hastings to join the New York office of Haynes and Boone. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 11:36 am
"Hayes has shown that the state's reasons for striking ... were implausible or invalid, and therefore were pretexts for discrimination," stated the decision written by Judge Catharina Haynes, a former civil court judge in Dallas.And:The decision marked the second time in 13 months that the appeals court has overturned a case from Dallas County because of jury discrimination. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 5:29 am
See Haynes v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 2:25 am
In Hayne v. [read post]
