Search for: "State v. Haynes" Results 41 - 60 of 322
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2021, 3:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Defendants thus met their initial burden on their motion for summary judgment based on that defense (see Haynes v Williams, 162 AD3d at 1378). [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 2:23 pm by Kevin LaCroix
A version of this article previously was published as a Haynes and Boone client alert. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Owen, Jennifer Walker Elrod, and Catharina Haynes, and now joined by recent Trump appointees Don R. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 12:33 am by Giesela Ruehl
George Bermann (Columbia Law, New York, USA); on panel three: Melanie Willems (Haynes Boone, London, U.K.) and Prof. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 4:49 pm by Unknown
Haynes Investments, LLC (Payday Lending)Martinez v. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 6:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
The case that may provide the best support for the State's contention is Trans Union Corp. v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 12:45 pm
SCWC-16-0000807 (Apr. 30, 2020) (changing foreclosure math; concurring and dissenting opinion by Nakayama, J. in which Recktenwald, C.J., joins); and Haynes v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 12:45 pm
SCWC-16-0000807 (Apr. 30, 2020) (changing foreclosure math; concurring and dissenting opinion by Nakayama, J. in which Recktenwald, C.J., joins); and Haynes v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 3:12 pm by Richard Hunt
That was enough to state a claim and keep the ADA claims alive. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 3:04 am by Michael Douglas
Nettle J quoted (at [269]) the following passage from the native title case Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v Victoria (2002) 214 CLR 422, 445 [49] (Gleeson CJ, Gummow and Hayne JJ): Laws and customs do not exist in a vacuum. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 1:54 pm by Kevin LaCroix
A version of this article previously was published as a Haynes and Boone client alert. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 6:02 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
Haynes & Haynes P.C., 940 F.3d 635 (11th Cir. 2019), the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, which governs Florida federal courts, clarified the test for application of the doctrine of judicial estoppel. [read post]