Search for: "State v. Haynes" Results 41 - 60 of 321
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2020, 3:12 pm by Richard Hunt
That was enough to state a claim and keep the ADA claims alive. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 3:04 am by Michael Douglas
Nettle J quoted (at [269]) the following passage from the native title case Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v Victoria (2002) 214 CLR 422, 445 [49] (Gleeson CJ, Gummow and Hayne JJ): Laws and customs do not exist in a vacuum. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 1:54 pm by Kevin LaCroix
A version of this article previously was published as a Haynes and Boone client alert. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 6:02 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
Haynes & Haynes P.C., 940 F.3d 635 (11th Cir. 2019), the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, which governs Florida federal courts, clarified the test for application of the doctrine of judicial estoppel. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 6:56 am by Richard Hunt
Indeed, if it were, ADA violations could give rise to a state law action in tort. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:53 pm by Mark Walsh
He cites “a justice who served as an Arizona state legislator” and quotes from Sandra Day O’Connor’s opinion in Davis v. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 12:19 pm by Richard Hunt
Where repeat litigation is likely – as in website cases – settlement by Consent Decree may be a valuable defense, subject of course to the difficulties we discussed after the decision in Haynes v Hooters.* Default as a strategy. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 4:52 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Haynes Investments, LLC  (Lending Operations)United States of America v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 11:06 am by Unknown
Haynes Investments, LLC (Lending Operations)United States of America v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:34 am by Diane Marie Amann
Krstić and a “turning point” appellate ruling in Prosecutor v. [read post]