Search for: "State v. Haynes" Results 101 - 120 of 318
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
This article was previously published as a Haynes and Boone client alert. [read post]
20 May 2020, 12:45 pm
SCWC-16-0000807 (Apr. 30, 2020) (changing foreclosure math; concurring and dissenting opinion by Nakayama, J. in which Recktenwald, C.J., joins); and Haynes v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 12:45 pm
SCWC-16-0000807 (Apr. 30, 2020) (changing foreclosure math; concurring and dissenting opinion by Nakayama, J. in which Recktenwald, C.J., joins); and Haynes v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 10:04 pm
Also, given the CCA's recent holding in Haynes v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 8:12 am by Tom Crane
 Yet, we in Texas and other states tolerate campaign contributions which stain our courts with the appearance of impropriety. [read post]
27 May 2009, 4:15 am
It is simply that a list containing the names of less than three persons interested in appointment to the position is not a mandatory eligible list.Where there is a non-mandatory list in existence, the appointing authority may [1] select an individual whose name is on the list for permanent appointment to the position or [2] make a provisional appointment to the position or [3] elect to keep the position vacant.In contrast, where there is a mandatory list available for appointment to the position,… [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 7:42 am
On Friday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued an opinion in Stewart v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:46 pm by John Floyd
Hayne upheld the trial court’s grant of qualified immunity to the two state experts. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Here is the Haynes and Boone firm’s memorandum. [read post]