Search for: "State v. Heald" Results 41 - 60 of 66
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2009, 2:47 pm
Heald struck down state laws that permitted in-state -- but not out-of-state -- wineries to sell wine directly to in-state consumers as state discrimination against interstate commerce in violation of the dormant commerce clause. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 3:19 pm by familoo
But the 25% statistic used by Oliver Heald does not come from court statistics, not from any proper research and it is unverified. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 5:35 pm by Michael Stevens
Heald, 544 U.S. 460 (2005), that the in-person purchase requirement in portions of Kentucky’s statutory scheme discriminated against interstate commerce by limiting the ability of out-of-state small farm wineries to sell and ship wine to Kentucky consumers. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 5:35 pm by Michael Stevens
Heald, 544 U.S. 460 (2005), that the in-person purchase requirement in portions of Kentucky’s statutory scheme discriminated against interstate commerce by limiting the ability of out-of-state small farm wineries to sell and ship wine to Kentucky consumers. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 7:18 am
The Passions: A Study of Human Nature (John Wiley & Sons, 2018)Harris, William V. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:47 am by Dave
Flintshire argued, drawing on the judgment of Lord Hailsham in London & Clydeside States Ltd v Aberdeen DC [1980] WLR 182, that this was at the lower end of the spectrum of procedural defects so as to enable the court to find that Mrs Tyrrell's review was not a nullity. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:47 am by Dave
Flintshire argued, drawing on the judgment of Lord Hailsham in London & Clydeside States Ltd v Aberdeen DC [1980] WLR 182, that this was at the lower end of the spectrum of procedural defects so as to enable the court to find that Mrs Tyrrell's review was not a nullity. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
New York State Liquor Authority[15] involved a New York law under which liquor distillers could not sell to wholesalers in New York except in accordance with a monthly price schedule that affirmed that prices in New York were no higher than the lowest prices charged in other states.[16] Healy v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 11:55 am by Paul J. Feldman
Ultimately, though, changes in technology, and consumer demand for “skinny bundles” of programming, may harken the death knell for the idea of “must-have” programming entirely. **************** Fletcher, Heald and Hildreth has deep experience in retransmission consent negotiations and all types of programming carriage issues. [read post]