Search for: "State v. Hearn" Results 41 - 60 of 121
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2012, 3:52 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has flat out refused to follow the Supreme Court’s March 2012 Martinez v. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 8:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 28765 (SD TX, Feb. 21, 2018), a Texas federal district court dismissed a Native American inmate's complaint that some of his religious articles were confiscated.In Hearns v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 5:30 am by Katie Gu
  Hearn’s opinion focused heavily on the holdings of six states with “strikingly similar constitutional privacy protections” applied to protect privacy in medical decisionmaking: Louisiana in State v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 10:10 am by Jack Pringle
"South Carolina Supreme Court: Web-Based Emails Are Not "Backup"In 2012, the South Carolina Supreme Court, in Jennings v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:36 am by Steve Hall
In Georgia, meanwhile, the state supreme court has refused to designate Hill as mentally retarded, scoffing at the mandate of Atkins v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 1:20 pm
 And remember that Chief Justice Beatty, in contrast to Justices Hearn and Pleicones, agreed with Justice Toal in dissent that under South Carolina law as defined in the (2009) All Saints Waccamaw case, only an express written agreement by a parish to place its property into a trust for ECUSA's benefit could create an enforceable trust in that State. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:34 pm
 And remember that Chief Justice Beatty, in contrast to Justices Hearn and Pleicones, agreed with Justice Toal in dissent that under South Carolina law as defined in the (2009) All Saints Waccamaw case, only an express written agreement by a parish to place its property into a trust for ECUSA's benefit could create an enforceable trust in that State. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 6:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 158785 (WD NY, Nov. 16, 2016), a New York federal magistrate judge allowed a Nation of Islam inmate to file an amended complaint alleging that a corrections officer prevented him from possessing his religious materials.In Hearns v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 2:13 pm
That was a reference to the opinions by Justices Pleicones and Hearn, who wanted to change the "neutral principles" rule laid down in All Saints Waccamaw to a "complete deference to the national church" rule of Watson v. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 2:52 am by SHG
While the Supreme Court held that a state could not put a retarded person to death in Atkins v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:51 am by SHG
  And so Hearn got double burned.As alarms go off everywhere but Texas, the Supreme Court's ruling in Martinez v. [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 5:47 pm
While the unconstitutionally biased Justice Hearn agrees with him (Opinions, p. 21 [concurring "fully" in the opinion of A.J. [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 5:47 pm
While the unconstitutionally biased Justice Hearn agrees with him (Opinions, p. 21 [concurring "fully" in the opinion of A.J. [read post]