Search for: "State v. Henderson"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,079
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2021, 4:46 pm
Judgment was reserved On Tuesday 27 April 201 the Court of Appeal (Sharp P, Henderson and Warby LJJ) heard the appeal in case of Riley v Sivier. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 4:33 am
In this post, Kenny Henderson and Zainab Hodgson of CMS summarise the first day of submissions in the appeal of Lloyd v Google LLC, which concerns a claim alleging that the appellant (‘Google’) breached its duties as a data controller to over 4m Apple iPhone users during a period of some months in 2011- 2012, when Google was able to collect and use their browser generated information. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 1:37 am
In this post, Kenny Henderson and Alex Askew of CMS preview the appeal being heard over the next two days in the matter of Lloyd v Google LLC, which concerns a claim alleging that the appellant (‘Google’) breached its duties as a data controller to over 4m Apple iPhone users during a period of some months in 2011- 2012, when Google was able to collect and use their browser generated information. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 11:38 am
Henderson ... [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 8:00 am
See Henderson v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 10:14 am
The case is SA Palm Beach LLC et al. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 7:28 pm
Henderson v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 4:26 am
Henderson that same-sex spouses should not have the same rights to be listed on state-issued birth certificates as opposite-sex spouses. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 12:45 am
In this post, Kenny Henderson, David Bridge, Jessica Foley and Devina Shah, who all work within the litigation and arbitration team at CMS, comment on the decision handed down last week by the UK Supreme Court in the matter Mastercard Incorporated and others v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE [2020] UKSC 51, which has significant implications for the UK competition law collective proceedings (or class actions) regime. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 9:56 am
Henderson. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 2:00 am
The second judgment to be handed down is Ecila Henderson (A Protected Party, by her litigation friend, The Official Solicitor) v Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 12:49 pm
Barr v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:06 am
In the 1986 case Moore v. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 4:37 pm
The first, Henderson v Chief Constable of Fife Police (only available on Westlaw), she argued was related to the issue of liberty and the limits of police authority, not privacy. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 10:16 am
Under the Supreme Court precedent of Cheney v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 6:45 am
Henderson said. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 7:10 am
Mesa and Ziglar v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 10:44 am
” The majority emphasizes that, in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 5:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
Lord Justices Floyd and Arnold disagree on the inventiveness of expandable hoses [2020] EWCA Civ 871
24 Jul 2020, 12:29 am
The case of Emson v Hozelock ([2020] EWCA Civ 871) considered whether a relatively technically simple invention was non-obvious in view of an obscure prior art document. [read post]
