Search for: "State v. Henderson" Results 241 - 260 of 837
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2016, 1:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
San Francisco State University, August 11, 2016, Henderson, T.).Hospital workers certify Rule 23 class action alleging additional WARN Act notice required By Matt Pavich, J.D.A North Carolina district court has granted certification of a Rule 23 class action to a group of former hospital employees in their WARN Act lawsuit. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
So why are California and other states muscling their way into provision of private pensions? [read post]
24 Jul 2016, 9:58 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 7715 (TX App., July 21, 2016), a Texas state appeals court affirmed the dismissal of a claim by a Jewish-Druid inmate that insistence he receive an insulin dose at 3:00 am violates his free exercise rights because his religion requires that he not eat or rise before sunrise.In Henderson v. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 2:31 pm by familoo
She expressly states he may have injured her, albeit innocently. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 5:49 am by Joy Waltemath
Judge Henderson filed a separate opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment; Judge Srinivasan filed a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part (Verizon New England Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:58 am by Amy Howe
Texas, in which the Court will consider whether the state used the correct standard to determine whether death-row inmate Bobby James Moore is too intellectually disabled to be executed, as well as the grant in Buck v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 4:40 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on Monday’s decision in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 9:00 am by Steve Vladeck
At its core, and in response to the Supreme Court's decision in Hamdan v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:33 am
Dodd, 598 F.3d 449, 452–53 (U.S.Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit 2010)); see also United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
Henderson was not present, the court announced that she would consider the case based on the audio recording of the oral argument. [read post]