Search for: "State v. Hendrix"
Results 41 - 60
of 172
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2024, 4:15 am
Judge Hendrix summarizes his opinion in Texas v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:16 am
Even though the case seemed a clear example of defense of another, the COA initially denied his claim, stating that it was controlled by the then-recent opinion in State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 8:26 am
Pardon the Jimi Hendrix allusion, but it seemed appropriate given yesterday’s Supreme Court decision in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 8:26 am
Pardon the Jimi Hendrix allusion, but it seemed appropriate given yesterday’s Supreme Court decision in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 9:28 am
In Jones v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 7:10 am
Sherman v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 12:31 pm
Hendrix, Sup. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 12:45 pm
P'ship v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 5:05 pm
In 2019, the court ruled in Rehaif v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 7:57 am
Jimi Hendrix: Forty years ago Jimi Hendrix trilled his plaintive query: “Is this love, baby, or is it … [just] confusion? [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 7:57 am
Jimi Hendrix : Forty years ago Jimi Hendrix trilled his plaintive query: "Is this love, baby, or is it … [just] confusion? [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 10:12 am
After losing a battle in 2005 to have Jimi Hendrix’s right of publicity protected by New York state law, where Hendrix lived at his death, Hendrix’s heirs worked to amend the Washington state right of publicity law. [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:41 pm
See United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 8:02 am
(Midler v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 2:19 pm
[Talking Points Memo] https://www.scribd.com/doc/253504322/Terry-Hendrix-NFL-Lawsuit [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 1:40 pm
Paxton’s claims in Texas v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 5:57 pm
Genzyme Corp. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 4:05 am
State) and Venis' case. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:59 am
Dan McGowan explains via the Experience Hendrix v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 9:17 am
In lieu of granting leave to appeal in Hendrix v. [read post]