Search for: "State v. Hendrix"
Results 81 - 100
of 174
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2022, 12:54 pm
Hendrix: Under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
Hendrix and Moore v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 9:59 am
In the majority opinion in Murthy v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 11:57 am
Brown, 21 A.D.2d 738, 249 N.Y.S.2d 922; State v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 12:58 am
This has been considered by the UK Court of Appeal to potentially apply to performances by deceased artists in the case of Experience Hendrix LLC v Purple Haze Records Ltd (which dealt with performances by the late Jimi Hendrix). [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 4:31 pm
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 9:07 pm
The complaint states that plaintiffs John M. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 2:59 am
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
Hendrix, 375 Ark. 200 (2008), and Dachs v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:13 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 May 2024, 5:23 am
International Court of Justice: South Africa v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 7:45 am
Moving on to infringement and remedies, Hugo reviewed the important decision in Experience Hendrix v Times Newspapers, among others. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:24 pm
Tex. 1969); United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 1:31 pm
VI; United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 9:40 am
" McBride alleges Sacks, during a phone conversation with AMP promoter Bobby Hendrix ("Hendrix"), stated he did not trust AMP to schedule shows with Partisan because of McBride, telling Hendrix "AMP Ballantyne was not vetting its promotors or working with seasoned people," purportedly in reference to McBride. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 7:30 am
Oral argument Tuesday afternoon in United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 3:09 am
Kristie Urban, No. 98,856 (Johnson)State appeal (petition for review)Janine CoxSufficiency of evidence for agg escape from custody chargeState v. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 10:17 am
No, not New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 12:15 pm
Armenta v. [read post]
