Search for: "State v. Hills"
Results 1 - 20
of 5,769
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2024, 1:15 am
Chung v Notting Hill Genesis This is a case that exemplifies the Court’s power to extend time limits. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 2:45 pm
E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2]respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 9:00 pm
As the Supreme Court made clear in Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 10:12 am
Nahid Nassiri v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 5:13 am
The court properly dismissed plaintiff’s claim pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) because he failed to state a cause of action (Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87 [1994]). [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 4:52 pm
On the same day, judgment was handed down by Hill J in Khokan v Nirjhor (Re Costs) [2024] EWHC 1873 (KB). [read post]
20 Jul 2024, 6:11 pm
Here also is a map that summarizes this (from this article); the dark gray states are the ones where this sort of firing is most likely to be illegal: For a case bearing on whether government employers may fire employees for saying, after an assassination attempt on the President, "If they go for him again, I hope they get him," see Rankin v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 7:00 am
David V. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 8:00 am
J.J. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 2:25 am
” Mizrahi v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 4:50 am
To satisfy the pleading requirement for causation, it must be alleged that “but for” the attorney’s conduct, the client would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have sustained any ascertainable damages” (Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 272 [1st Dept 2004]; Cosmetics Plus Group, Ltd. v Traub, 105 AD3d 134, 140 [1st Dept 2013]). [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 1:05 am
The draft regulation is now under debate in the Council of States. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 2:00 am
The Supreme Court already removed one such guardrail in Trump v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 8:50 am
The documents included: A denunciation to the Prosecutor General’s Office from Nikolai Ryzhkov, a career security officer and State Duma deputy who has been under U.S. sanctions since Russia’s 2014 invasion of Ukraine. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 4:24 am
State Department spokesperson said. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 3:00 am
Below is my column in The Hill on the over-wrought reaction to the Supreme Court decision in Trump v. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
Below is my column in the Hill on the Supreme Court decision on Friday in Fischer v. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 12:33 am
And finally…II For any tort/obligations geeks out there: the memorial tablet to Donoghue v Stevenson on the site of the Wellmeadow Café: [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 10:27 am
[4] People v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 10:27 am
[4] People v. [read post]
