Search for: "State v. Hobbs" Results 281 - 300 of 720
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2017, 10:00 am by Howard Friedman
Hobbs is not a basis for reopening a court's 2011 dismissal of an inmate's religious items and holiday claims.In Santos v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 4:23 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
United States: Why the Hobbs Act Punishes Co-Conspirator Extortion (Maryland Law Review, Vol. 75, No. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 1:43 am by Tom Pritchard
  Counsel presented case law that the ordinary meaning of the words and legislative history supported a broad interpretation of the phrase (Hobbs v Winchester Corpn [1910] 2 KB 471, Place v Rawtenstall Corpn (1916) 86 LJKB 90, Clayton v Sale Urban District Council [1926] 1 KB 415 and Neath Rural District Council v Williams [1951] 1 KB 115). [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 2:32 pm by John Elwood
United States overruled United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 7:16 am by Kate Howard
United States overruled United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 11:28 am by John Elwood
United States 15-9260 Issues: (1) Whether the trial evidence was sufficient to establish that the petitioner’s robbery of a dealer of illegal drugs “in any way or degree * * * affect[ed] commerce,” in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 3:32 am by Peter Mahler
While I’m not aware of any New York cases directly addressing the issue, a recent decision by Chancellor Ellen Hobbs Lyle of the Tennessee Business Court in Wilford v Coltea, Case No. 15-856-BC [Tenn. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 8:03 am by Eric Baxter
Hobbs, the Court unanimously protected a Muslim inmate’s right to maintain his religious beard while in prison. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:52 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court held that “‘a robber who affects or attempts to affect even the intrastate sale of marijuana grown within the state’ necessarily satisfies the ‘affects commerce’ element of the federal Hobbs Act criminal statute. [read post]