Search for: "State v. Hockings" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2020, 5:11 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  States with very red governments, including big states like Texas and my very own Florida, need these funds every bit as much as states with blue leadership like New York and California. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 3:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
While the complaint sufficiently states a cause of action for fraud, it is time barred. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 9:29 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
”   Seasoned attorneys—or those who were practicing law before the United States Supreme Court’s 1977 decision in Bates v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
  Levinson and Balkin mention Shelby County v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:07 am by Susan Brenner
Hock Chee Koo (sic), __ F.Supp.2d __, 2011 WL 777965 (U.S. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
(2) Does the ICCTA preempt a state agency’s voluntary commitments to comply with CEQA as a condition of receiving state funds for a state owned rail line and/or leasing state-owned property? [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Supreme Court ruling in Texas Dept. of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]