Search for: "State v. Hoffmann"
Results 61 - 80
of 295
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2016, 5:06 am
Hoffmann, 74 M.J. 542, 555 (U.S. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 12:27 pm
The case is Kathleen Rossitto v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 12:27 pm
The case is Kathleen Rossitto v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:19 am
PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v SSHD, W & BB v SSHD and Z, G, U & Y v SSHD, heard 30 – 31 January 2012. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 4:02 am
Current state of the law The House of Lords decision in Lawson v Serco Ltd [2006] ICR 250 is the leading case in this area. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 1:45 am
Ever since the judgment of Lord Hoffmann in Lawson v Serco Ltd [2006] UKHL 3; [2006] ICR 250, the territorial scope of the protection from unfair dismissal contained in the Employment Rights Act 1996, s 94(1) has been a matter of some debate. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 6:01 am
Hoffmann-La Roche Holding AG engaged in biotechnology research. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 11:32 am
You can separately subscribe to the Pharma & Biotech edition of the IP Thinktank Global Week in Review by subscribing by email, or selecting ‘all posts’ or ‘Pharma, Biotech & Chem’ for the RSS option at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Mircera (Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta) - US: Trial judge grants permanent injunction in case relating to recombinant erythropoietin (EPO) patent: Amgen… [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 1:34 am
This was the subject of an interim decision of Roth J. earlier this month in the Competition Appeal Tribunal: Secretary of State for Health and Others v Servier Laboratories Limited and Others [2017] EWHC 2006 (Ch) (available here). [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:32 am
As Lord Hoffmann said in the Privy Council libel case of Gleaner v Abrahams ([2004] 1 AC 628) “Personal injury awards are almost always made in actions based on negligence or breach of statutory duty rather than intentional wrongdoing. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:11 am
Harrow Community Support Ltd v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am
” The judge clearly had regard to Ms Ntuli’s stated motives for wanting to sell her story (see, for example, paragraph 32 of his judgment). [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:57 pm
by its mRNA (the encoding gene) in T-cell and B-cell lymphomas, and (v) the information that Neutrokine-? [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 4:26 pm
Lord Hoffmann said as follows:"2. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 12:02 am
Hoffmann, Counterclaims John Y. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 9:05 pm
The Supreme Court first examined the constitutionality of a delegation of authority from Congress to a Tribe in United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 1:42 pm
The Moore Opinion also states that the true and fair view is of an overarching nature. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd., [2001] 1 All E.R. 700 (H.L.), at p. 706, per Lord Hoffmann; see also Nichols v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 8:47 am
The Court was of the view the Lord Hoffmann in Kirin-Amgen had erred by conflating these two issues into a single question of interpretation. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 8:47 am
The Court was of the view the Lord Hoffmann in Kirin-Amgen had erred by conflating these two issues into a single question of interpretation. [read post]
