Search for: "State v. Holbrook" Results 41 - 60 of 143
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2016, 11:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Tasting the TM in Pepsi/Coke studies.What we know about brands v. what we know about TMs—Deven Desai has written about the distinction and the lack thereof that has been part of the problem. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 5:02 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Abishek Nagaraj: Good job of studying IP free zones v. struggles. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:47 pm by John Elwood
Denn 15-1234Issue: Whether a state's interest in “increas[ing] . . . information concerning those who support the candidates,” Buckley v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am by John Elwood
United States, 15-8629, and Beckles v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 6:39 am by Kate Howard
United States 15-8544Issue: (1) Whether Johnson v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm by John Elwood
Holbrook, 15-7848, is a capital case beginning its third season as a relist after another three spent biding its time as a far less prestigious rescheduled case. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 6:02 pm by Kate Howard
United States 15-8544Issue: (1) Whether Johnson v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:32 am by John Elwood
Holbrook, 15-7848, yet another a capital case that’s now on its second relist. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 12:37 pm by Kate Howard
United States 15-8544Issue: (1) Whether Johnson v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 8:13 am by John Elwood
Holbrook, 15-7848, a capital case (another one?) [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 3:29 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Potential inducers of patent infringement here could be the sellers of the 3D printers, someone providing CAD files of the patented device, or websites that sell or share various CAD files that instruct the 3D printer to make the patented invention.IPBiz notes In a 6-2 decision in June 2015, the United States Supreme Court in Commil USA, LLC v. [read post]