Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 181 - 200 of 8,020
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2022, 7:49 am by Alexander J. Davie
” As proposed, an illiquid fund would be defined as a fund that (i) has a limited life; (ii) does not continuously raise capital; (iii) is not required to redeem interests upon an investor’s request; (iv) has as a predominant operating strategy to return the proceeds from the disposition of investments to investors; (v) has limited opportunities, if any, for investors to withdraw before the termination of the fund; and (vi) does not routinely acquire (directly or indirectly) as… [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 2:19 pm by Keith Mallinson
They state there that ’we present empirical evidence of “hold-up”—i.e., evidence of opportunistic behavior by SEP enforcers that is intended to unreasonably inflate royalties. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
How should we think about the disadvantage that holders of idiosyncratic beliefs face under P2? [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Roberts, the author of the notorious 2013 ruling in Shelby County v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
United States that challenges to impeachment are non-justiciable. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:29 am by Peter Mahler
In Tradesman Program Managers, LLC v Doyle, decided earlier this month by the Appellate Division, First Department, the court affirmed a decision by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Andrea Masley rejecting the tax estoppel argument made by the putative holder (JCB) of an 18.75% membership interest in an LLC. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 6:48 am by Matthew Hersh (Wolters Kluwer)
Substantial evidence supported the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s finding that another company, and not the trademark holder, actually used the mark in commerce. [read post]